<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Performance on CSP Guide</title>
    <link>https://csp-guide.com/tags/performance/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Performance on CSP Guide</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://csp-guide.com/tags/performance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>How CSP Affects SEO and Page Performance</title>
      <link>https://csp-guide.com/posts/how-csp-affects-seo-and-page-performance/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://csp-guide.com/posts/how-csp-affects-seo-and-page-performance/</guid>
      
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Content Security Policy is usually filed under “security hardening,” but that’s too narrow. A CSP can absolutely change how search engines render your pages, how fast those pages feel, and whether your analytics and consent stack work at all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’ve seen teams ship a “secure” CSP that quietly broke structured data injection, blocked critical JS, delayed rendering, and then wonder why indexed pages dropped or conversion tracking disappeared.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CSP doesn’t directly boost rankings. Google isn’t handing out SEO points because you added &lt;code&gt;object-src &#39;none&#39;&lt;/code&gt;. But CSP affects the stuff that &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; matter: renderability, crawl consistency, Core Web Vitals, and whether bots and users get the same usable page.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
